On 3rd May, Jenny published a short report about what he was hearing from his home country, the Democratic Republic of Congo, in reaction to Covid19.
Today, we publish his open letter to Prime Minister Boris Johnson:
Dear Mr Johnson
I am writing to you regarding the actions of you special advisor, Dominic Cummings, the further actions of yourself, Boris Johnson and the potential consequences of the actions of the two.
Although not tested in court, it is clear to many, including those with considerable legal expertise, that Dominic Cummings has violated the regulations and accompanying directives. Dominic Cummings during the question period after his statement in the Downing Street Rose Garden said that his wife had no symptoms, while in his statement he said there was a high probability that he already had caught the disease. He cannot play on both counts. If his wife had no symptoms, there was no emergency, so no need to travel. If he thought he had caught the virus, he was breaking government regulations and advice. Cummings admitted that he went to the hospital when he was sick and very likely to have Covid-19. Again, this was not an emergency because his wife and child were in the hospital. Why did someone in their support network, the reason they went to Durham in the first place, not complete this task?
These regulations and the directives that accompany them have been followed to the letter by the overwhelming majority of the population. As you know, this has resulted in both considerable anxiety and self-sacrifice for many people across the UK. The public adopted a collectivism where the needs of the greatest number were privileged over individual advantages. This is one reason why there has been so much anger at the actions of Dominic Cummings, which has been compounded by the absence of apologies and Johnson’s defense of his actions.
We all make decisions that in hindsight we can see are incorrect and we are of course all human and emotions can hinder clear logical thinking. However, I would like to emphasize that when it is a young child, nothing is entirely “momentary” because there is a lot to prepare. All in all, I am not convinced by Cummings’ argument for making the decisions he made, and it seems that the majority of the public is of the same opinion.
In any case, whether we accept his explanation or not, we must all accept that there are consequences for our actions, whatever our motivations for carrying them out. As Dominic Cummings has an extremely high profile, his actions have more potential consequences and that is why people in positions like his are bound by higher standards than others. Imagine me as an asylum seeker, I acted the same as Mr Dominic and then I am arrested by the police, you know very well that mine would be a direct arrest, but curiously I simply note that we are in a world of untouchables, because the treatment which is to be reserved to the special adviser to the Prime Minister is a privilege, taking into account his social rank.
The actions taken by Cummings and the lack of consequences of those actions, including a resounding endorsement by yourself that Cummings behaved “responsibly, lawfully and honestly”, have potentially significant public health consequences, including an increased number of deaths.
Mr Prime Minister, I take this opportunity to inform you that during this long and hard period of confinement, I had to face a dark period of my life, because I lost more than 30 people from my Congolese community everywhere in the United Kingdom, the people who were very dear to me, but given the rules of restrictions imposed by your government, I had to stay at home in spite of myself without attending any funeral ceremony.
This approval by the Prime Minister, the absence of an apology and the absence of any disciplinary action has led to the belief that there is one rule for the British public and a different rule for those in high office. You will be aware from your inbox that it is not just anger at the “Westminster bubble” or resentful “Leftovers” as some reviewers have indicated.
The success of the fight against the coronavirus depends on a number of factors, including clear messages, confidence in the government and so that we all act in a way that, while restricting our freedoms, benefits our communities in their together. The actions Dominic Cummings took and your solid defense risked all three. The frankly bizarre explanation of the trip to Barnard Castle has led to general ridicule which further weakens the government’s message. We are in a critical phase of the fight against the coronavirus, which is unfortunately likely to last a long time. The government appears to have proposed relaxing the lockout for political rather than scientific reasons and against “science”. Some have argued that it was to divert attention from the lingering anger around Cummings.
Two questions come to mind:
- Have Dominic Cummings’ Actions and Their Defense by Boris Johnson increased the likelihood that critical government messages will be ignored, with potential public health consequences?
- Have Dominic Cummings’ absence of apologies and Boris Johnson’s approval of his special adviser broken trust between government and the public, with potential public health consequences?
If you answer yes to any of these questions, I think your action on this question should have been the same as that of many of your fellow British citizens, who have asked for the resignation of Dominic Cummings. Your opinion? I ask you to reconsider your position.
Jenny Dakosta Van Mputu, Directeur Exécutif National, Human Rights Activist-Founder and National Executive Director of ‘No Impunity for the Congolese State’ (NICS) – Human Rights Organisation